By Hans K. Fauske, D.Sc., Emeritus President, ANS Fellow, AIChE Fellow, NAE Member
where
The superficial vapor velocity jv corresponding to fluidization can be estimated from (Wallis, 1969),
where α is the volume fraction of liquid droplets, and
Combining Eqs. (2) and (3) and setting CD = 1 and α = 0.6 (corresponding to a state when spherical liquid droplets no longer are touching each other) results in the minimum fluidization velocity,
and the peak critical heat flux
It follows that
In summary, considering an appropriate hydrodynamic limit based upon a flow regime change from liquid to vapor continuous condition due to incipient fluidization (Eq. 5), this limit is clearly substantiated based upon the highest reported heat flux values obtained with well-wetting surfaces at different pressures. As such, the microporous surfaces used by Rainey et al., provide the maximum possible heat removal rates.
Register for FAI University's Relief Systems Design Course
References
Levich, V. G., 1962, “Physiochemical Hydrodynamics,” Prentice Hall .
Rainey, K. N., et al., 2003, “Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Microporous Surfaces in Surfaces in FL-72,” Journal of Heat
Transfer, Vol. 125/75 (February).
Wall is, G. B., 1969, “One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow,” McGraw-Hill .
Zuber, N., 1958, “On the Stability of Boiling Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer 80(2), pp . 711-720.